Phobos moon orbiting Mars showing its heavily cratered surface and irregular potato shape against the backdrop of space
Phobos, Mars' largest moon, measures just 17 miles across yet harbors one of the solar system's most intriguing geological mysteries

High above the rust-colored surface of Mars, a small, potato-shaped moon named Phobos spins silently through the void. Just 17 miles across and 14 miles wide, this cosmic remnant is barely larger than many terrestrial cities. Yet somewhere on its cratered, dust-covered terrain stands something utterly remarkable: a boulder the size of a 30-story building, jutting skyward at 90 meters tall, casting a shadow across the alien landscape that scientists first spotted more than two decades ago. It's called the Phobos monolith, and it represents one of the most intriguing mysteries in our solar system—a mystery that blurs the line between natural wonder and the kind of geometric precision that makes even skeptical scientists pause.

The Discovery That Sparked a Thousand Questions

The monolith came into public view thanks to meticulous analysis of archival imagery from NASA's Mars Global Surveyor. Efrain Palermo, conducting extensive surveys of Martian probe data, spotted the peculiar feature in 1998 images—specifically frames SP2-52603 and SP2-55103. Lan Fleming, an imaging subcontractor at NASA's Johnson Space Center, confirmed the discovery. What they found wasn't subtle: an 85-meter-wide, 90-meter-tall rectangular boulder near the massive Stickney crater, standing alone on Phobos' dusty plains like a sentinel from another age.

The dimensions are staggering when you consider Phobos itself has a mean diameter of only 22 kilometers. Proportionally, it's as if a structure nearly half the height of the Great Pyramid appeared on an island the size of Philadelphia. The monolith's sharp edges and seemingly deliberate geometry created an immediate stir—not just among planetary scientists but across a public increasingly fascinated by extraterrestrial anomalies. Former astronaut Buzz Aldrin even spoke publicly about the feature in a C-SPAN interview, expressing his support for a mission to investigate it directly.

How Scientists Study a Distant Boulder

Analyzing a rock 85 million kilometers away presents challenges that would make terrestrial geologists weep. You can't grab a sample, drill a core, or tap it with a hammer. Instead, planetary scientists rely on orbital imaging, spectroscopy, shadow analysis, and computational modeling—a toolkit that turns pixels and light into geological narratives.

The highest-resolution views of the monolith come from Mars Express, the European Space Agency's orbiter that's been studying the Red Planet since December 2003. Its Super Resolution Channel camera can achieve resolutions better than 30 centimeters per pixel under ideal conditions. In 2024, researchers developed a fully automated pipeline to restore motion-blurred SRC images using geometry-derived point spread functions and Wiener deconvolution. This technique recovered sub-meter features across 14 high-resolution images, revealing surface textures and structural details that were previously smeared by the camera's rapid motion relative to Phobos.

Shadow analysis provides crucial dimensional data. Because the sun illuminates Phobos from predictable angles during orbital passes, scientists can calculate the monolith's height and orientation from the shadow it casts. The shadow's length and direction align with local light sources, confirming the 90-meter height estimate and suggesting the surrounding terrain is relatively flat—a detail that becomes important when evaluating formation theories.

Spectroscopy adds compositional context. Recent spectral analyses using Mars Express's OMEGA instrument examined Phobos' red and blue units in the 0.4–2.5 micrometer range. While these studies focus on broader regional variations rather than the monolith specifically, they reveal a surface dominated by carbonaceous and silicate materials—consistent with an asteroid origin. Whether the monolith shares this composition or represents a distinct material is still unknown, though its bright appearance in images hints at a different reflectivity.

Natural Processes vs. Engineered Precision

The central debate about the Phobos monolith boils down to a single question: Did nature carve this feature through blind geological forces, or does its geometry suggest something more deliberate?

The natural explanation centers on impact ejecta. Phobos is covered in craters, with Stickney—the largest at 9 kilometers across—dominating one hemisphere. When an asteroid or comet fragment slammed into Phobos billions of years ago, it would have excavated enormous quantities of material, hurling boulders across the moon's surface with enough force to escape the weak gravity field entirely or land kilometers away. The monolith could simply be one such ejecta block that happened to land upright, its rectangular shape a coincidence of fracture planes in the parent rock.

Phobos' low gravity—just 0.0057 m/s², or about 600 times weaker than Earth's—means that ejecta can travel far and settle gently. A longitudinal study of Phobos' crater size-frequency distribution revealed heterogeneity driven by resurfacing processes and orbital dynamics. Material doesn't just fall where it's ejected; it redistributes over millions of years through gravitational interactions with Mars, micrometeorite bombardment, and the slow shedding of dust into space. The monolith, in this view, is a frozen moment in that long geological story.

Yet the skeptics point to the boulder's apparent right angles and flat surfaces. Popular interest in the feature has cycled through waves of speculation since 2009, often fueled by comparisons to science fiction monuments or suggestions of extraterrestrial construction. While mainstream science dismisses artificial origin theories as unsupported by evidence, the precision of the monolith's geometry remains striking. Fracture patterns can create sharp edges—particularly in brittle, low-gravity environments—but achieving multiple perpendicular faces in a single boulder is less common.

Some researchers have noted that Phobos itself may be a captured asteroid from the nearby main belt, its irregular, lumpy shape and low density suggesting a rubble-pile structure rather than a solid rock. If Phobos consists of loosely bound fragments held together by self-gravity, individual blocks within that assemblage could exhibit angular geometries inherited from collisional breakup in the asteroid belt. The monolith might predate Phobos' capture by Mars, representing a fragment of a larger parent body shattered eons ago.

Giant rectangular monolith boulder standing 90 meters tall on Phobos surface casting prominent shadow across cratered terrain
The Phobos monolith towers 90 meters above the moon's surface, its geometric precision sparking debate about natural versus artificial origins

Implications for Future Missions

The monolith isn't just a curiosity—it's a potential landing site for future exploration. The PRIME mission (Phobos Reconnaissance and International Mars Exploration), proposed by Optech and the Mars Institute, identified the vicinity of the monolith as a target for both an orbiter and a lander. Studying the feature up close would answer questions that orbital data can't: Is the boulder a coherent rock or a pile of smaller fragments? What minerals compose it? Are there weathering patterns, stress fractures, or regolith deposits that reveal its history?

Japan's JAXA is already planning the Martian Moons eXploration (MMX) mission, scheduled to launch in the late 2020s. MMX aims to return samples from Phobos, potentially settling the question of its origin—asteroid capture versus debris from a giant impact on Mars. While the monolith may not be a direct sampling target, data collected during orbital surveys and landing operations could shed light on its nature.

Even tech entrepreneur Elon Musk has expressed interest in investigating Martian anomalies, including monoliths. As Mars colonization efforts advance, Phobos could serve as a staging ground for orbital infrastructure—its low gravity makes it ideal for launching and receiving cargo without the fuel costs of ascending from Mars itself. If we're going to build on Phobos, we might as well understand what already stands there.

Public Fascination and Scientific Rigor

The monolith has become an internet phenomenon, cycling through waves of renewed attention every few years as new images surface or commentators revisit old data. This pattern mirrors a broader cultural appetite for mysteries at the edge of human knowledge. We live in an age where rover tracks on Mars are posted to Instagram, where citizen scientists analyze exoplanet data from their laptops, and where the question "Are we alone?" feels increasingly answerable within our lifetimes.

The danger, of course, is that sensationalism drowns out the science. Headlines proclaiming alien artifacts oversimplify a geological puzzle that deserves rigorous investigation. But the fascination itself isn't trivial—it reflects a hunger for discovery that drives both public support for space exploration and the recruitment of the next generation of scientists. When Buzz Aldrin talks about the Phobos monolith on national television, he's not just promoting a mission; he's inviting millions to wonder what else might be out there.

Scientists, for their part, tread a careful line. They must remain skeptical of extraordinary claims while staying open to unexpected findings. Phobos has already surprised researchers with its hollow interior structure—or at least a lower-than-expected density that suggests significant porosity. Its orbital decay rate, about 1.8 centimeters per year, implies it will either collide with Mars or break apart into a ring system within 50 million years. These are strange, counterintuitive facts about a moon we've studied for decades. The monolith is just one more reminder that Phobos doesn't reveal its secrets easily.

Contextualizing the Find in Mars Exploration History

Mars and its moons have captivated humanity since Asaph Hall discovered Phobos and Deimos in 1877, naming them after the sons of Ares in Greek mythology—Fear and Dread. Hall's discovery came during a golden age of telescopic astronomy, when new instruments were revealing the solar system in unprecedented detail. Yet even today, with spacecraft orbiting Mars and rovers drilling its rocks, these tiny moons remain enigmatic.

Phobos orbits Mars closer than any other moon orbits its planet in the solar system—just 6,000 kilometers above the Martian surface. From the ground on Mars, Phobos would appear about one-third the size of our Moon in Earth's sky, rising in the west and setting in the east multiple times per Martian day due to its rapid 7.6-hour orbit. Observers on Mars could watch Phobos and Deimos occasionally cross paths, a celestial dance that Mars Express captured on video in August 2024 and released to the public in March 2025.

The monolith fits into a larger pattern of Martian anomalies that have fueled both scientific inquiry and speculative fiction. Mars itself hosts a rectangular boulder captured by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter's HiRISE camera, which operates at roughly 30 centimeters per pixel resolution from 300 kilometers away. NASA noted it as an example of common surface features in that region, likely a product of erosion and fracturing in layered bedrock. The Phobos monolith may be more dramatic in scale, but the underlying mechanisms—impact, fracture, erosion—are the same forces that shape all airless bodies.

Preparing for the Next Chapter

What happens next depends on funding, politics, and the shifting priorities of space agencies worldwide. The MMX mission represents Japan's most ambitious planetary science endeavor to date, a recognition that understanding Mars' moons could unlock clues about the planet's formation and the early solar system's evolution. If Phobos is a captured asteroid, its composition might resemble primitive carbonaceous chondrites—the building blocks of planets. If it's impact ejecta from Mars, samples could contain Martian crustal material thrown into orbit billions of years ago.

Either way, the monolith will be there, waiting. It's survived whatever cataclysm created or relocated it, endured billions of years of micrometeorite bombardment, and now stands as a potential waypoint for human exploration. When the first astronauts set foot on Phobos—whether in 2040 or 2080—they might climb that 90-meter tower, drill into its base, and finally answer the questions we've been asking from afar.

Space probe conducting orbital survey of Phobos with high-resolution cameras and scientific instruments capturing surface details
Future missions like JAXA's MMX could finally answer questions about the monolith's composition and origin through close-up analysis and sample return

The Broader Implications

The Phobos monolith isn't just a geological curiosity; it's a test case for how we approach extraterrestrial exploration. Do we privilege the spectacular over the mundane? Do we chase headlines or follow the data? The answer, ideally, is both. The monolith captures imaginations in ways that spectroscopic surveys and crater counts don't. It gives the public a narrative hook, a single compelling image that represents the strangeness and possibility of space. If that fascination translates into support for missions that also conduct rigorous science—missions that map surface composition, measure seismic activity, and test hypotheses about moon formation—then the monolith has served a dual purpose.

It also raises questions about how we define anomalies. At what point does a feature transition from "interesting" to "unexplained"? The monolith's geometry is unusual but not impossible. Its size is remarkable but not unprecedented—Phobos hosts numerous large boulders, though few as photogenic. The real puzzle isn't the monolith itself but our reaction to it, the way it triggers our pattern-recognition systems and our deep-seated desire to find order in chaos.

This impulse has driven science since its inception. We look at the stars and see constellations, not random points of light. We examine rock strata and reconstruct ancient seas. We measure the red shift of galaxies and infer an expanding universe. The monolith is just another data point in that grand project, a challenge to our models and a reminder that the cosmos still holds surprises.

Looking Forward

Within the next decade, we'll likely have more data on the Phobos monolith than ever before. Advanced imaging from next-generation orbiters, possibly including synthetic aperture radar that can penetrate subsurface layers, will reveal internal structure. Thermal sensors could detect temperature variations that hint at composition. And if MMX or a subsequent mission lands nearby, we might finally hold a piece of that ancient boulder in our hands.

Until then, the monolith stands as it has for eons—silent, towering, and deeply strange. It represents both what we know and what we don't, a monument to the limits of remote sensing and the promise of direct exploration. Whether it's a random chunk of rock or a clue to Phobos' violent past, it's become a symbol of the questions that drive us outward, beyond our blue world and into the mysteries that circle above Mars.

So what should we make of Phobos' enigmatic tower? Perhaps the most honest answer is that we don't yet know enough to be certain, but we know enough to be fascinated. And in the long arc of exploration, fascination is often the first step toward understanding.

Latest from Each Category