Telegraph operator reacting to equipment sparking during 1859 Carrington Event solar storm
The 1859 Carrington Event caused telegraph systems worldwide to spark and catch fire—today's interconnected infrastructure faces far greater risks

On September 1, 1859, astronomers watched in fascination as a massive sunspot cluster appeared on the Sun's surface. Hours later, telegraph operators across two continents reported something extraordinary: their equipment was operating without batteries, powered solely by currents induced in the wires. Some claimed they could send messages even with their power supplies disconnected. Then the telegraphs began to spark, setting paper on fire. The Carrington Event had arrived, and it would prove to be the most powerful geomagnetic storm in recorded history. Today, if a similar storm struck, it wouldn't just disrupt telegraphs. It could cripple the technological infrastructure that keeps modern civilization running.

Understanding Solar Storms and the Carrington Benchmark

Solar storms begin with magnetic energy building up in the Sun's atmosphere, sometimes reaching values around 2×10³² ergs in the largest active regions. When this energy releases suddenly, it produces solar flares: intense bursts of radiation that reach Earth in about eight minutes. But the real danger comes from what follows: coronal mass ejections (CMEs), billion-ton clouds of magnetized plasma that can take one to three days to traverse the 93 million miles to our planet.

The Carrington Event produced both. On September 1, 1859, British astronomer Richard Carrington observed the strongest solar flare ever recorded through his telescope's projection screen. The associated CME slammed into Earth's magnetosphere just 17 hours later, an exceptionally fast transit suggesting speeds exceeding 2,000 kilometers per second. For comparison, typical CMEs travel at 300-500 km/s.

What makes a Carrington-class event so dangerous isn't just its strength but its rarity. Studies of ice core records and tree rings suggest such storms occur roughly once every 150-200 years. The last confirmed extreme event happened 165 years ago. We're statistically overdue.

The Cascade of Modern Vulnerabilities

In 1859, the most advanced electrical technology consisted of telegraph networks spanning perhaps 200,000 kilometers globally. Today, Earth is wrapped in millions of kilometers of conducting material: power transmission lines, undersea cables, pipelines, and railway tracks. Each acts as an antenna capturing geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) during solar storms.

Power grids face the most immediate danger. When a CME compresses Earth's magnetosphere, it induces quasi-DC currents in long transmission lines. These currents weren't anticipated when most grid infrastructure was designed. They cause transformer cores to saturate, leading to overheating, excessive reactive power consumption, and in severe cases, permanent damage. A single large transformer can cost $10 million and require 12-18 months to manufacture and install. The March 1989 Quebec blackout, caused by a storm far weaker than the Carrington Event, demonstrated this vulnerability when it left 6 million people without power for nine hours.

Satellites represent another critical weakness. Over 8,000 active satellites now orbit Earth, supporting everything from GPS navigation to financial transactions. Solar storms can damage satellite electronics through radiation, degrade solar panels, and increase atmospheric drag at low orbits by heating and expanding the upper atmosphere. After the May 2024 G5-level storm, SpaceX reported losing approximately 40 Starlink satellites due to increased drag.

GPS and high-frequency radio communications fail when solar radiation ionizes the upper atmosphere. Aviation becomes particularly risky since aircraft at high latitudes and altitudes receive increased radiation exposure during storms. The Federal Aviation Administration estimates that pilots and crew on polar routes can receive annual radiation doses comparable to radiation workers in nuclear facilities.

Underground infrastructure isn't safe either. Pipelines experience accelerated corrosion from induced currents, and cathodic protection systems designed to prevent corrosion can be overwhelmed. Railway signaling systems that rely on track circuits to detect trains can malfunction when GICs interfere with the low-voltage detection signals.

Power grid operators monitoring geomagnetically induced current sensors during solar storm alert
Real-time GIC monitoring systems allow grid operators to detect dangerous currents and take protective action before transformer damage occurs

Current Forecasting: Better Than Nothing, But Not Enough

The good news: we're no longer blind to solar threats. NOAA's Space Weather Prediction Center operates 24/7, monitoring solar activity through a network of ground and space-based instruments. The recently launched SWFO-L1 satellite, positioned at the L1 Lagrange point about 1 million miles from Earth, provides critical warning time by observing solar wind conditions before they reach our planet.

This early warning system typically offers 15-90 minutes of notice, depending on CME speed. For the May 2024 storm, forecasters successfully predicted the shock arrival time at Earth within a few hours using models like EUHFORIA (European Heliospheric Forecasting Information Asset). That's impressive, but still barely enough time to implement emergency procedures.

The challenge lies in prediction accuracy and lead time. We can detect when a CME leaves the Sun, but determining whether it will hit Earth directly, glance us, or miss entirely requires sophisticated modeling. Variables include the CME's direction, speed, magnetic field orientation, and how it interacts with the solar wind along the way. Current models achieve roughly 70% accuracy for major storm predictions with 1-3 days notice.

NASA and NOAA are investing heavily in next-generation monitoring. The recently launched missions will help, but they're playing catch-up. The aging DSCOVR satellite, launched in 2015, has been providing critical solar wind data from L1 but exceeded its design life years ago. When SWFO-L1 fully replaces it, forecasters will have better instruments, but the fundamental physics of prediction won't change dramatically.

Recent research suggests solar activity is entering a more intense phase that could peak around 2025-2026, with the Centennial Gleissberg Cycle indicating increased activity continuing potentially until 2055. This means we may face elevated risk for decades.

Hardening the Grid: Engineering Solutions

Power utilities have learned from past storms. Modern protection strategies include installing neutral blocking devices that prevent GICs from entering transformers, improving monitoring systems to detect GIC flow in real-time, and developing operational procedures to reduce grid vulnerability when storms are forecast.

Some utilities now install GIC monitoring sensors at critical transformer locations. These sensors provide real-time data on induced currents, allowing operators to shed load, reconfigure the network, or take transformers offline before damage occurs. The technology exists; the challenge is deploying it across thousands of vulnerable substations globally.

Grid topology matters enormously. Long transmission lines running east-west at high latitudes are most vulnerable since GICs flow along the north-south direction of geomagnetic field variations. Resilience planning now includes considering GIC vulnerability when planning new transmission routes and reinforcing critical nodes that could cascade failures across regions.

Emerging technologies offer promise. Modular, distributed power systems with more local generation and storage could provide resilience if major transmission infrastructure fails. High-voltage DC transmission lines, while expensive, are less vulnerable to GICs than conventional AC systems. Some forward-thinking utilities are incorporating space weather resilience into their long-term infrastructure modernization plans.

But here's the sobering truth: comprehensive grid hardening would cost billions globally and take decades to complete. A 2017 study estimated that upgrading just the U.S. power grid to withstand a Carrington-level event could require $10-30 billion in infrastructure investment. Very few utilities have implemented comprehensive protection despite the known risk.

Satellite Protection and Orbital Traffic Management

The satellite industry has become acutely aware of space weather threats. Modern satellites incorporate radiation-hardened electronics, redundant systems, and protocols for entering safe mode during storms. Operators monitor space weather forecasts closely and can preemptively shut down vulnerable systems or reorient solar panels to minimize exposure.

GPS presents special challenges since the technology underpins critical infrastructure from financial market timestamps to precision agriculture. The U.S. military designed GPS satellites with space weather resilience in mind, but civilian users depend on ionospheric corrections that break down during storms. Emerging alternative positioning systems, including ground-based alternatives and multi-constellation receivers (GPS, Galileo, GLONASS, BeiDou), provide redundancy if one system degrades.

Low Earth orbit is becoming crowded, with mega-constellations like Starlink adding thousands of satellites. During storms, atmospheric expansion increases drag, accelerating orbital decay. This creates collision risks as satellites drift from their planned positions. Improved space traffic management and rapid orbital adjustment capabilities are becoming essential.

Satellites in Earth orbit monitoring solar wind and space weather conditions for early storm warning
New space weather monitoring satellites at the L1 Lagrange point provide critical early warning by observing solar conditions before they reach Earth

What Governments Should Do Today

National preparedness requires treating space weather as the infrastructure threat it is. The U.K. includes severe space weather on its National Risk Register alongside terrorism and pandemic flu. The U.S. has a National Space Weather Strategy and Action Plan, but implementation has been inconsistent.

Governments should mandate space weather resilience standards for critical infrastructure, similar to cybersecurity requirements. This means requiring utilities to install GIC monitoring, maintain emergency response plans, and conduct regular exercises. Aviation authorities need clear protocols for routing aircraft away from polar regions during extreme storms and managing the inevitable flight delays.

International cooperation is crucial since space weather doesn't respect borders. The International Space Environment Service coordinates global forecasting efforts, but funding remains inadequate. Expanding the network of monitoring stations, particularly in the southern hemisphere where coverage is sparse, would improve forecast accuracy for everyone.

Regulatory frameworks need updating. Grid reliability standards in most countries don't adequately address space weather scenarios. Building codes should consider GIC effects on long metallic structures. Insurance and financial regulators should require businesses to assess space weather risk in their continuity planning.

Investment in research pays dividends. Understanding why some CMEs produce extreme GICs while others don't, improving prediction models, and developing better protective technologies requires sustained funding. The return on investment is clear: a few billion dollars in preparedness could prevent trillions in economic damage.

Business and Individual Preparedness

Organizations should start with risk assessment. Does your business depend on GPS timing? Could you operate without satellite communications? What happens if the power grid fails for days or weeks? Honest answers often reveal uncomfortable vulnerabilities.

Critical infrastructure operators should implement space weather in their emergency planning alongside other scenarios. This includes maintaining spare transformers and critical components, training personnel on storm response procedures, and establishing communication channels with forecast centers. Some industries already do this well; aviation has clear protocols, but many sectors lag behind.

For individuals, preparedness resembles preparation for any extended infrastructure disruption. Keep emergency supplies including water, non-perishable food, medications, and backup power. Maintain paper copies of critical information since electronic systems may fail. Have a battery-powered or hand-crank radio for emergency alerts. Stay informed about your region's specific risks; high-latitude areas face greater threats.

Financial institutions should ensure backup systems don't rely on the same infrastructure as primary systems. GPS timing failures could disrupt trading systems, ATMs, and payment networks. Redundant timing sources and the ability to operate in degraded modes would help maintain critical financial functions.

Small steps multiply. Homeowners can install surge protectors on major appliances. Communities can establish neighborhood preparedness networks. Schools and hospitals should include space weather in their emergency protocols. These measures also improve resilience against terrestrial threats like hurricanes or earthquakes.

The Technology Frontier: Next-Generation Protection

Research frontiers offer hope for better forecasting and protection. Machine learning algorithms are improving CME trajectory predictions by identifying patterns in solar magnetogram data. Recent simulations demonstrate that data-driven models can predict free magnetic energy buildup days before major eruptions, potentially extending warning times.

Advanced materials science may deliver better protective technologies. Graphene-based surge protectors, superconducting fault current limiters, and radiation-resistant semiconductor materials could harden critical systems. The challenge is scaling these laboratory successes to industrial applications.

Heliophysics missions planned for the next decade will provide unprecedented solar observations. NASA's planned missions to send probes closer to the Sun than ever before, combined with improved Earth-orbiting instruments, should significantly enhance our understanding of solar dynamics. Knowledge gaps remain—we still can't predict the magnetic field orientation in approaching CMEs, a critical factor in storm severity—but progress continues.

Some researchers propose ambitious solutions like space-based magnetic deflection systems, essentially artificial magnetospheres to shield satellites or even ground infrastructure. These remain firmly in the realm of science fiction for now, but they illustrate the creative thinking needed to protect technological civilization from its stellar neighbor's outbursts.

Looking Forward: A Resilient Civilization

The next Carrington Event isn't a question of if but when. Current estimates suggest a 10-12% probability of a Carrington-class storm hitting Earth in any given decade. Over a 50-year period, that probability exceeds 50%. Given the stakes, these aren't comfortable odds.

The good news is we have time and knowledge our ancestors lacked. We understand the physics, have monitoring systems in place, and possess technologies to mitigate the worst effects. What we've lacked is urgency and sustained investment. That's beginning to change as awareness grows and the satellite-dependent economy creates powerful incentives for protection.

International cooperation offers the most promising path forward. Recent collaborative forecasting efforts demonstrate what's possible when nations share data and resources. Space weather threatens everyone equally; it's one area where geopolitical rivals share common interest in mutual protection.

Perhaps most importantly, space weather preparedness delivers co-benefits for other risks. Hardened grids resist terrorist attacks and extreme weather. Distributed power systems support renewable energy integration. Improved monitoring helps basic solar science. Satellite resilience protects against orbital debris. The case for investment becomes even stronger when considering these multiple benefits.

The Carrington Event happened in an era when our most sophisticated electrical device was the telegraph. Today, we've built a civilization entirely dependent on technologies vulnerable to the same solar fury. We know the threat exists. We have the capability to protect ourselves. Whether we actually do so will determine if the next great solar storm becomes a manageable challenge or a civilization-scale catastrophe. The choice, ultimately, is ours. We can't control the Sun, but we can control whether we're ready when it inevitably reminds us of its power.

Latest from Each Category